Before the scientific
explanation, there is the animal and the vegetal cells and they are different one
of the other and one of the things that the two kinds are different is that :
The animal
cells have mitochondria and the vegetal cells have not,
I study in
the collegial that the mitochondria had DNA, the DNA suppose to have only in
the nucleus of the cell and not in a organelle, but the mitochondria had DNA,
and in the collegial I learn that the DNA of the mitochondria is different of
the DNA of the nucleus, so I learn also that the our ancestral unicellular in
the primitive era eat other cell that would be the mitochondria and the
mitochondria pass to be its organelle, and this cell would be the ancestral for
all the animals,
For today
if is animal even the unicellular had mitochondria.
So the
theory is if you put a animal mitochondria in a vegetal like ‘mamonas’ ‘castor’
you
will make a flying animal, if be papaya a nervous animal that would need a
alimentation with animal hormones to have a healthier state of body, but if in
a better like cocoa plant a pterosaurs, isn’t a delightful theory?
DNA is made
of atoms, organelles are made of atoms.
The
mitochondria had a special multiplication in the time of mitoses and meioses.
In my
theory the vegetal used would be a pluricellular but would be in the time that
the cell is unicellular before the meiosis to make a living being .
Rute Bezerra de Menezes Gondim
No comments:
Post a Comment