About Cinema

And what is in the scene, was a matter about filming and is this, you know that have the cliché and is that you only show something in the scene if is very necessary, the professor said that only would use that one closeup of object if give many information in that cut, you see have the cliché you fall in the common discourse, everybody knows that many pills maybe the person is going to the psychiatry, so used so common. Is that the professor said that one camera is over because was too many shots of the same scene, but wasn't the scene without it poor, he was directing a movie and not a soap-opera, when you make something that is all days you wouldn't edit to be inspiring and self-explained, but in a movie the cut that the professor said that was too much wasn't, give meaning for the scene, without you only see a man rising of the bed and was almost a soap-opera scene, the man arising the bed could be all throw in the trash, I don't mind that in the morning he came out of the bed everybody one time of the day do that I am interested in what he is thinking, and the way he does that explain that he is piss with the life, without is only a man getting out of the bed, who cares? Without the table, I only understand that he grabs glasses because he put them in the face but even that act came out of the scene, his hand was in the scene out of the framework, so was really need he got glasses? I could put he in another place with the glasses and you gonna think he got the glasses before went out of the bedroom, and you gonna have concision and the audience would be reading the cards that you show for them, this is make cinema say many with little, of course if was in the theatre all will gonna be show without at least one cut. Also if I watch that scene was so poor without the table that I would call the actor or a hand model to make to interprate that cut for me and I apply in the edition. And also have something that is very need and is cleaness, nobody like to see a scenography with many information that give with the time headache and watcher don't understand what is happening with his head but he is torturing himself with mental images that make suffering, is because the scene is with many objects and the camera eye sometimes make actors and scenary be in the same plane and that is grotesque and painful. Also the scene was good with many cuts because the movie was the character don't say what is in his mind, I am trying to understand what the problem of him and he doesn't say, in the real world you want to know what meaning of a face or an act, in the movie you wait, and 'cut' and 'scene' are different but the two occur with an edition, that is you get two parts and put one after the other to see in the sequence, is that if the cut change the narration you gonna have another scene, Ok. Rute Bezerra de Menezes Gondim