Answering a psychographed question

 And is about legs amputee, let me say that the medicine of Europe was very modern, but with the war...

And is that many legs that was amputee, was amputee because the owner doesn't wanted a very defected leg! Even losing a span of bone the doctors manage to save the legs, but the muscle are completely inshort, so is deformed leg, can you imagine a thigh rounded like a big ball, so a woman with a defected leg the dresses cover but a man? So was more easy a woman keep a ugly leg, but a man, they prefer return to the doctor to cut out. Was a time that was more easy a woman marry an man that loose one leg then a man that had a such deformed leg, so pity is better then disgusting? But arm is other history, of course but with that asault to the European books what was lost... So much culture, is inches and inches for thousands of years a cowardy war of so much falsity, but we ate the lyes with sorrow, but enough don't make the history more criminal that already is, who suppose to die of shame is the mouth that say them. I don't want listen about anymore, have one theory about wars, the winners write the history of the way that they want, don't you felt shame think that have people that write what they want? No matters how offensive the lyes are?

Rute Bezerra de Menezes Gondim