An International Court of Merchant (=Commerce) Law

In school I learn that the difference of merchant and commerce is that the word merchant is older and the commerce came to substitute for some occasions, so Merchant is the same than Commerce. So in ‘International Law’ the Tribunal isn’t in the common previous to the fact, shocking… in the national law the Tribunal have to be always previous to the fact. But in the case of the Mercosul, Alca, the Europe and Asians Countries have previous Court permanent, for South America is the Mercosul, the Mercosul have a tribunal specially for the commerce, but the tribunal is only competent only when the involved countries are members of the Mercosul. The other case that the case is International is when is a crime against the Humanity like the court of the Judgments of Nuremberg they was arguing that aren’t competent because the Tribunal didn’t exist before the crime and they ask to be judge for a Country Court, and not a International Court. And when is a Commerce fact to judge the fact and the two of the countries aren’t at the same time of the Alca, Mercosul, the Pacific sea Countries or from the European Alliance had to be made a Tribunal only for the fact and had to have the involved Countries and some others neutral Countries. Had some kinds of embargo to a country that don’t came to a International Court, so the Country suffer commercials embargos of all the countries like a pact, like their merchandise can’t came out of the port, the products that came from this country in the international market is paid less than the others that came from other country, the others countries don’t sale goods for this country, and others kind of embarrass, like limitation for the passport, the passport be not recognize being legal.

Rute Bezerra de Menezes Gondim