Even that have in the cinema

And in a movie about the scenarium, to justify almost don't have I think that is need a brilliant history, an impressive actor, because some times isn't only need a god action but an actor that when came inside a room or an scene the persons have the action to follow him with the eyes have those types of persons, the ones that in the middle of the crowd people got impress with them and apreciate look, many times calls affection, almost never hate or repulse, and returning for the movie also is good an end that run from the common speech.

Another short-movie that I saw the good was that the director create a narrative without a history because was teaching camera enquadramento and moviment. So was a play that you really follow along because the person knows tell a history but han't history, but that explored in the cinema a second time why someone would like, so a second is very ridiculou and criticize, like you have make really shit, but one day someone would do that again and be good.

And other is a short-movie that the director cofessed that, for the movie used an famous classic writer, so the actors don't asked cash-cachê, the movie was shoot in a house that a friend loan for him and the expensive was the clothes and he was waiting for good reviews, is a little prestensious don't you think?

And for least the actuation what you expect, of course that isn't value for Brazil, but for others places is that what appear in the sun, will reflects in all the planets around even the ones that are very far, why in solar system the heavy ones are far? Their weight repells atraction? So is that in many countries the atuation of the TV is sheaper than the ones that are for the cinema, this doesn't happens in Brazil the TV is where an actor have to be to be famous, but in others countries let me say how is the director if working for the TV they really want one that repeat many times the record, but not in all the stations if the stations is small they don't give work for give work for the editor, and for the cinema is that they don't give work for who let the editor be the director, you give the possibility of the editor be an virtual director, in the end the artistic taste is of the editor, and the director is just a person that held the camera, even some shots artistic that you done, if you give the full liberty of creation for the editor he can truw in the trash because is the master, even for a studio is hard in a premiation think that the director is the one that supposes to receive an prize for best direction, I think that even an prize comite a judging panel would not choice to a competition a movie that is made with so much assistance of the editor, this isn't value for an prize for the TV. Rute Bezerra de de Menezes Gondim